Psalms 69:30 ( NKJV ) 30 I will praise the name of God with a song, And will magnify Him with thanksgiving.
As I reflect on this Thanksgiving Day, I find myself thankful not only for the blessings of family and the freedom we enjoy here in America and much more, but I am in awe of the God of the Universe who in His mercy and for His reasons (grace), redeemed me. I have found myself lately contemplating my absolute unworthiness to be counted in the beloved (Ephesians 1:4-6). It amazes me and confounds any reasoning I am able to conjure up! Now, just how is it that my salvation is “according to the good pleasure of His will… and to the praise and glory of His grace” (vv. 5-6)? The latter is somewhat easier to understand in light of my unworthiness but I still find myself stunned by the reality of it all and completely given over to thankfulness for the incredible miracle of new birth in Christ and to be “accepted into the beloved” (vs.6).
When the Scriptures state that our salvation ” is not of works” (Ephesians 2:8-9; Romans 9:11, Titus 3:5), it is total in its meaning. There was no good thing found in any of us. We were utterly dead (Ephesians 2:1-3,5; Colossians 2:13; Hebrews 9:14), incapable of pleasing God. If we have been regenerated by the Holy Spirit (John 3:5-8; 5:21; Ephesians 2:1,5), we stand in Christ by the sole work of Christ on Calvary’s Cross.
The simple point is this; our salvation is really not about us but about Christ. He redeemed us for His glory (Ephesians 1:3-5; 2:7), to demonstrate His grace, certainly not for any so called inherent goodness within us. So our thankfulness is to His glory, for His praise, unto His honor. Even His love toward us in redemption points us to Him and Him alone. And lest we forget, God loved us while we were yet sinners (Romans 5:8) , not the other way around (1 John 4:10).
~ Michael Holtzinger
I have been enjoying a book on the life of John Calvin, edited by Burk Parsons, called “John Calvin, A Heart For Devotion Doctrine and Doxology.” As I was reading I was impressed by the clarity of Keith A. Mathison in chapter 14, “Transforming Grace,” and his clear and persuasive explanation of the reformer’s biblical view of the doctrine of regeneration. This view has been lost to a great extent by those who claim to be “Protestant” and “Evangelical,” and as a result much of the church that claims to be “Bible believing” has moved to an evangelism that is semi-Palagian (seeker sensitive), not to mention Armenian. So, without further ado, here are two salient paragraphs:
For our Lord there was a clear line in the sand. There were things that were non-negotiable, so important, simply because the eternal fate of men’s souls, the truth of God’s Word, and the glory of God were at stake.
There seems to be two extremes that run through broader evangelicalism. One that is strident and will argue over any deviation of theology or methodology and the other extreme that sees little value in strongly held doctrine and a view of methodology that is purely pragmatic – if it works, then it’s OK. Whether it’s fundamentalism, seeker driven, emergent, or much of mainline evangelicalism, finding when and where to draw the line in the sand, knowing where to take a stand is an issue that is absolutely necessary to know if we are to “contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints.” Just where is that line? To even raise the question for many is offensive. But it must be asked and it certainly needs an answer.
With my whole heart I have sought You; Oh, let me not wander from Your commandments!
Recent Comments